FencingWise

Fence Environmental Claims vs EPDs: Compare the Same Basis

An environmental product declaration provides quantified information within a defined method and scope. It is not a blanket label saying that a fence is environmentally preferable, and an EPD for a raw material does not automatically represent the finished fence made from it.

Identify the document and the product

Record the declaration owner, product description, programme, registration reference, validity and applicable product category rules. Check whether the data cover the actual product, a product group or another stated population.

Finished black powder-coated steel fence installed beside a public footpath
The declared product scope must connect to the actual finished fence being evaluated.

The International EPD System’s published comparison conditions require aligned comparison bases, including function, units, lifecycle coverage and methods. The example declaration belongs to its named owner; it is not evidence for FencingWise products.

Align units before interpreting numbers

Suppose a fictional material result is 2 kg CO₂e per kg of product and the relevant component mass is 12 kg per metre. Multiplication gives 24 kg CO₂e per metre for the scope represented by that material result.

That conversion alone does not produce a complete fence EPD. It omits any additional components or processes outside the original scope. It also does not establish comparability with a figure already reported per metre for a different fence function or lifecycle boundary.

Bundles of steel tube raw material stored for production inspection
A result stated per kilogram of raw material does not by itself represent a complete installed fence per metre.
Comparison field Why it matters
Declared or functional unit Defines the quantity and function being represented
Product performance Prevents unlike duties being treated as substitutes
Lifecycle modules Identifies which stages are included
PCR and method versions Establishes the applicable calculation rules
Geography and scenarios Explains relevant supply and end-of-life assumptions
Validity and verification Identifies the supported document and period

Keep modules and indicators distinct

Do not add or subtract reported stages without following the applicable method. A result for production alone should not be labelled whole lifecycle. Keep benefits or loads reported beyond the system boundary distinct from the core totals where the declaration requires it.

Steel fence components suspended along an industrial powder coating line
A manufacturing-stage result should remain within its stated lifecycle module and system boundary.

Likewise, climate impact is one indicator. A lower value in that column does not automatically establish that every environmental effect is lower. Avoid a broad “greenest fence” conclusion from one selected number.

Deal with missing data openly

If one offer has an applicable EPD and another has only an unsupported environmental statement, record the evidence difference. Do not invent a comparable figure for the second offer or assign it the industry average without a justified method.

A project may establish a separate evidence requirement before scoring environmental performance. Make that requirement clear to bidders so the evaluation does not change after quotations arrive.

Keep procurement claims within the document

Use the declaration’s actual scope in the comparison record. Do not remove its owner or present another manufacturer’s document as a certificate for the supplied fence. Confirm the connection between the product ordered and the declaration used.

The recycled-content guide handles material percentages; the sustainable purchasing checklist shows how evidence can be incorporated into a broader award decision.