FencingWise

358 vs Double Wire Fencing

358 mesh and double wire panels solve different specification problems. Close-spaced wires are central to the 358 form; paired horizontal wires define the construction of 656 and 868 panels. Comparing the names alone misses the panel dimensions, connections and site requirements that determine the finished fence.

The difference starts in the wire arrangement

In the traditional 358 reference, the 76.2 × 12.7 mm pattern describes wire centres. Its closely spaced horizontals restrict the available handhold. The actual wire dimensions and the measurement basis should still appear on the supplied drawing.

Close spaced 358 security mesh fence beside a perimeter road
The closely spaced 358 mesh forms one part of this perimeter fence.

Double wire fencing uses paired horizontal wires around a vertical wire. The 656 designation refers to nominal 6/5/6 mm wires; 868 refers to nominal 8/6/8 mm wires. The designation does not fix the mesh pattern or every other panel dimension.

Point of comparison 358 mesh Double wire mesh
Defining construction Close-spaced rectangular mesh pattern Paired horizontal wires with a vertical wire between them
First specification question What are the wire dimensions and mesh measurement convention? What wire arrangement, mesh pattern and panel dimensions are required?
Connection review Panel-edge clamping, overlap and post interface Clip or bar arrangement, panel width and post interface
Ground and access details Gaps at the ground, gates and transitions remain part of the boundary The same locations need review for the selected system
Performance evidence The mesh name is not a security rating Wire size alone is not a load capacity or security rating

Choose against the brief, not the larger number

Where restricting climbing footholds and handholds is a central requirement, the close mesh of 358 is relevant to the discussion. It still needs compatible posts, secure connections and correctly detailed openings. A close panel cannot compensate for an unresolved gap beside a gate or beneath a stepped run.

Where the brief calls for an open mesh boundary, double wire systems provide another configuration to evaluate. Fence height, accessible edge details, post spacing and gates still need to suit the application. For playing areas, a dedicated sports configuration may add requirements beyond an ordinary perimeter panel.

Blue double wire mesh fence around a recreation area
A double wire fence in use around a recreation area; the project brief still determines the required assembly.

Neither description establishes that a particular product meets a tender's resistance, structural or sports-performance requirement. Those decisions require the relevant design information and evidence for the proposed assembly.

Compare sightlines at the intended location

Mesh pattern, wire dimensions, viewing angle and finish all influence what can be seen through a fence. “Suitable for CCTV” is too broad to resolve a particular camera position. Where cameras are part of the design, review the selected panel with the required view and the responsible system designer.

A sample or properly specified drawing can help the project team discuss the difference. It should represent the proposed mesh, rather than a different product chosen only because it has the same family name.

Colourful double wire fence panels viewed from the path
The open wire pattern changes the view through these double wire panels.

Hold the supply scope constant when comparing prices

Use the same fence height, run layout and access requirements. Then set the two material schedules beside each other. A lower panel price may be accompanied by different posts, fewer included fittings or a different finish; those are specification differences, not an equal-scope saving.

For example, a comparison sheet can contain the following rows without inserting a supposed market price:

  • Panel specification and quantity by size.
  • Line, end, corner and gate posts.
  • Clamps or bars, fasteners and caps.
  • Gate leaves, hardware and adjoining details.
  • Finish, packing, required documents and delivery basis.

Record any exclusions next to the affected item. If the options serve different requirements, keep that distinction visible instead of presenting a single price per metre as the whole decision.

Continue with the actual product specification

Use the 358 panel page for close-mesh dimensions and connections, or the 656 panel page and 868 panel page for the twin-wire arrangements. The RFQ guide provides a way to put either option on a defined quotation basis.

Construction references

Compare the wire arrangement and opening dimensions on the drawings for the two proposed systems. Approvals and performance statements must apply to the actual products offered.

Compare two defined material packages.

Send the alternative specifications with the same heights, layout and gate requirements. Identify differences in posts, connections, finish and evidence before comparing the totals.

Discuss the Specifications
By Order
Minimum quantities
By Agreement
Sample arrangements
Confirmed in Quote
Production schedule